Deep-rooted Aegean border problems will be re-examined Friday by the Turkish and Greek prime ministers, who are set to meet in Athens on the sidelines of an international climate summit.
According to diplomats, however, there is no expectation of an instant breakthrough in resolving such problems even though Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s recent statements had fueled hopes to this effect.
“We do not want [military] flights over the [Aegean] islands,” Erdogan said in an interview with the Greek daily Kathimerini on Wednesday, asking that a compromise be reached through mutual understanding and effectively setting forth a series of proposals that could reduce tensions.
By means of a compromise, Erdogan suggested that NATO be invited to monitor how the two countries’ jets use the airspace over the Aegean since both neighbors are members of the alliance.
Meanwhile, Erdogan's belief in the need to foster more civilian involvement in attempts to prepare sufficient groundwork for a solution to the bilateral problems could be counted as his second proposal.
Another suggestion came from Erdogan’s chief foreign policy advisor, İbrahim Kalın, who said at a conference in Athens that Turkey could annul its declaration of “casus belli” if Greece withdrew possible plans to expand its territorial waters to 12 miles.
The suggestion was followed by calls from Turkey to eliminate all problems between the two countries in the Aegean so that both could benefit from tourism in the region.
Apart from tourism, the two countries could also launch joint drilling efforts in the Aegean to explore potential hydrocarbon reserves.
What makes these ideas more meaningful is that Turkey has removed Greece from its threat list, the National Security Policy Paper – widely known as the “red book.”
“We should go over these issues step-by-step, without making them a matter of daily political consumption,” a senior diplomat told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review on Thursday.
“It should be noted Turkey seriously and sincerely wants to engage in a process of resolving current problems,” said the diplomat. However, there have been no concrete responses from Greek authorities on the suggestions made by their Turkish counterparts.
Commentators from both sides have observed positive attitudes in both capitals about moving forward and finding a way to solve disputes. One form of evidence is that the exploratory talks between the two countries’ foreign ministries launched in the early 2000s have produced some progress in diplomats being able to introduce a road map for greater dialogue.
Turkey and Greece disagree over territorial water borders, airspace and the sovereignty of some islets in the Aegean. Greece believes there are no gray areas regarding the sovereignty of some congested islets in the Aegean. According to diplomats, the sovereignty issue can only be solved through the European Court of Justice while other disputes could potentially be solved through bilateral mechanisms.
However, it is not very likely the leaders will finalize any solution in the near future as diplomats believe “there are so many other things to do.”
By Serkan Demirtas (HDN)
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE U.S. CONGRESS
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήAs American citizens, we are extremely concerned about NPR's recent firing of Juan Williams. This blatant act of censorship is an attack on our First Amendment right to free speech. The fact that a taxpayer-funded entity, NPR, leveled the blow - at the urging of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the U.S. front group for the terrorist group Hamas and an unindicted co-conspirator in the nation's largest terror financing trial, is particularly disturbing.
As is now well known, Juan Williams, a long-time political commentator, recently appeared on The O'Reilly Factor to discuss the enemy of our times: radical Islam. During the dialogue, Mr. Williams spoke of his personal fears about potential radical Islamists.
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a press release, demanding that NPR immediately "address" Mr. Williams' statement. And address it they did -- by firing him.
Interestingly, in 1995, Nina Totenberg, NPR's Legal Affairs Correspondent, stated it would be "retributive justice" if the late Senator Jesse Helms or one of his grandchildren were to contract AIDS. How was this statement "addressed" by NPR? It wasn't. Ms. Totenberg still serves in the same position within the organization. What was different about the incident with Juan Williams? Political correctness applied to radical Islam and the involvement of CAIR, whose co-founder Omar Ahmad is on record declaring that the Qur'an should be "the highest authority in America" -- in effect calling for sharia law to replace the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.
Ironically, Mr. Williams also had noted on Mr. O'Reilly's show, that "political correctness can lead to some kind of paralysis where you don't address reality." NPR's firing of Mr. Williams demonstrated exactly the type of political correctness about which he spoke.
It is inexcusable that any individual or organization within the U.S. deny someone their right to free speech. It is especially egregious when that organization is taxpayer-funded. The necessary action in this instance is abundantly clear: completely defund NPR and do it now. When our government is spending the economic future of its citizens into the ground and bankrupting our children and grandchildren, the fact that our taxpayer dollars are going to an organization that practices censorship is incomprehensible and unacceptable.
We are waiting and watching for your response and remind you of your oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land.
Sincerely,
Professor Vasilios Gikas, Academician.